By David Bledsoe 
Price and Warranty
Exploring the pricing and warranty details for the 2025 Mazda CX-50 and the 2024 Toyota RAV4 can help potential RAV4 buyers make an informed decision. We will look at the MSRP and Starting Market Average for both models, as well as their respective warranty offerings.
MSRP and Starting Market Average
The Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) and Starting Market Average provide a baseline for comparing initial costs. According to TrueCar, the Mazda CX-50 has a slightly lower starting price compared to the Toyota RAV4.
| Model | Starting MSRP | Starting Market Average |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Mazda CX-50 | $28,925 | See TrueCar |
| 2024 Toyota RAV4 | $29,610 | Higher than CX-50 |
While the Mazda CX-50 offers a lower entry price, factors such as leasing options and available trims can affect the overall cost.
Warranty Comparison
Warranty coverage is another crucial aspect when considering a new vehicle. Here, we compare the warranty offerings for the Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4:
| Warranty Type | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Basic Warranty | 3 years/36,000 miles | 3 years/36,000 miles |
| Drivetrain Warranty | 5 years/60,000 miles | 5 years/60,000 miles |
| Rust Warranty | 5 years/unlimited miles | 5 years/unlimited miles |
| Roadside Assistance | 3 years/36,000 miles | 2 years/unlimited miles |
| Hybrid-EV Warranty | Not Applicable | 8 years/100,000 miles |
| Free Maintenance | 1 year/12,000 miles | 2 years/25,000 miles |
Mazda’s and Toyota’s basic and drivetrain warranties are comparable, offering peace of mind in terms of overall coverage. The Toyota RAV4, however, provides a superior hybrid warranty, which is essential for those considering fuel efficiency.
For more insights on various Toyota models, check out our articles on the corolla cross vs rav4 and rav4 vs highlander. Comparing these cars can help you identify the best fit for your needs and budget.
Performance and Specifications
Engine Power and Torque
When comparing the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4, it’s important to take a closer look at engine performance.
The Mazda CX-50 offers two engine options. The base is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine with 187 horsepower and 186 pound-feet of torque, while the upgraded turbocharged engine pushes the limits with an impressive 256 horsepower and 320 pound-feet of torque Torque News.
In contrast, the Toyota RAV4 is equipped with a 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine, providing 203 horsepower and 184 pound-feet of torque. Though it has slightly more horsepower than the base CX-50 engine, it falls short when it comes to torque Torque News.
| Vehicle Model | Engine Displacement | Horsepower (hp) | Torque (lb-ft) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-50 (Base) | 2.5L I4 | 187 | 186 |
| Mazda CX-50 (Turbo) | 2.5L Turbo I4 | 256 | 320 |
| Toyota RAV4 | 2.5L I4 | 203 | 184 |
For more detailed comparisons between different models, you may explore Mazda CX-5 vs Toyota RAV4 or Ford Escape vs RAV4.
Fuel Economy Ratings
Fuel efficiency is a key aspect to consider in the Mazda CX-50 vs Toyota RAV4 debate. Here’s how both models fare based on EPA estimates:
The Mazda CX-50 achieves:
- 25 mpg in the city
- 32 mpg on the highway
- 25 mpg combined Torque News
The Toyota RAV4 delivers slightly better fuel economy:
- 25 mpg in the city
- 35 mpg on the highway
- 30 mpg combined Torque News
| Vehicle Model | City MPG | Highway MPG | Combined MPG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-50 | 25 | 32 | 25 |
| Toyota RAV4 | 25 | 35 | 30 |
The Mazda CX-50 offers a hybrid variant expected to provide up to 219 horsepower and up to 38 combined mpg, which could be a game-changer for those prioritizing fuel efficiency Mazda USA.
For more comparative insights, consider checking our articles on RAV4 Prime vs Hybrid and CRV Hybrid vs RAV4 Hybrid.
These figures illustrate that while both the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4 have their respective strengths, the RAV4 holds an edge in overall fuel efficiency. However, the choice may depend on whether engine performance or fuel economy is a priority for the buyer.
Safety Features
Crash Test Ratings
When comparing the Mazda CX-50 vs Toyota RAV4, it’s crucial to examine their crash test ratings, as safety is a top priority for prospective buyers. Both the 2023 Mazda CX-50 and the 2023 Toyota RAV4 received a five-star overall safety rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
| Model | NHTSA Overall Rating | IIHS Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-50 | 5 stars | Top Safety Pick+ |
| Toyota RAV4 | 5 stars | Top Safety Pick |
According to Torque News, the Mazda CX-50 earned a Top Safety Pick+ rating from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), while the Toyota RAV4 earned a Top Safety Pick rating from the IIHS.
Safety Awards
Both the Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4 Prime are outfitted with a comprehensive suite of safety features, enhancing their qualifications for safety awards. The Mazda CX-50’s Top Safety Pick+ rating from IIHS highlights its exceptional range of safety capabilities. This prestigious award is given to vehicles that excel in all key aspects of safety, including crashworthiness and crash avoidance.
The Toyota RAV4, on the other hand, received the Top Safety Pick rating from IIHS, which also signifies a high level of safety but with certain criteria that the CX-50 surpasses for the additional “+” designation (TrueCar). Despite this, the RAV4’s consistent performance in safety tests solidifies its reputation as a reliable and secure option.
Both vehicles offer an array of advanced safety features, including:
- Brake Assist
- Automatic Braking
- Blind Spot System
- Lane Keep Assist
- Forward Collision Warning
- Backup Camera
- Parking Sensors
- Rear Cross-Traffic Alert
- Alarm System
- Traction Control
- Stability Control
- Tire Pressure Monitoring System
- Side Airbags
- Curtain Airbags
- Knee Airbags
- Pedestrian Detection
These features are pivotal in ensuring maximum safety during driving. For a more detailed look at safety features and their benefits, see our comparison of Corolla Cross vs RAV4.
Interior Space and Design
When comparing the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4, one crucial aspect to consider is the interior space and design. Both vehicles have their unique strengths, which cater to different needs and preferences.
Legroom and Cargo Capacity
In terms of legroom, the CX-50 offers more space, providing a comfortable experience for both the driver and passengers. The Toyota RAV4, while spacious, falls slightly short in this department. Below is a comparison of their respective legroom measurements and cargo capacities.
| Specification | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Front Legroom (inches) | 41.0 | 41.0 |
| Rear Legroom (inches) | 39.5 | 37.8 |
| Cargo Capacity | 31.4 cu ft (expandable to 56.3 cu ft) | 37.6 cu ft (expandable to 69.8 cu ft) |
The Mazda CX-50 has a cargo space of 31.4 cubic feet behind the second-row seats, expandable to 56.3 cubic feet with the seats folded (Mazda USA). On the other hand, the Toyota RAV4 provides 37.6 cubic feet of cargo space, which can be expanded to 69.8 cubic feet when the second-row seats are folded. Despite having slightly less overall cargo room, the CX-50’s flat and long cargo layout is optimized for easy loading and unloading of gear.
Interior Quality Comparison
The Mazda CX-50 is noted for having a more upscale interior compared to the Toyota RAV4. High-quality materials and refined design elements make the CX-50’s cabin feel more luxurious. Features like soft-touch surfaces, premium upholstery, and ergonomic design enhance the overall experience for occupants (Torque News).
In contrast, the Toyota RAV4 offers a more utilitarian and practical interior. While the materials and build quality are commendable, they do not quite match the upscale feel of the CX-50. However, the RAV4 focuses on functionality and ease of use, which is a significant advantage for customers seeking a reliable and straightforward cabin layout.
For potential buyers considering a broader spectrum of options, our comparison page Toyota RAV4 vs VW Tiguan and Hyundai Kona vs Toyota RAV4 provide detailed insights. Additionally, for those interested in trim comparisons, the RAV4 XLE Premium vs Limited page offers in-depth analysis.
Overall, the choice between the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4 for interior space and design will depend on individual preferences, whether one prioritizes a more luxurious feel or practical usability. Explore more about how these SUVs stack up in other areas such as Performance and Specifications and Technology and Features.
Technology and Features
When comparing the Mazda CX-50 vs Toyota RAV4, understanding the technology and features available in each model is crucial for potential buyers.
Standard Features
Both the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4 come well-equipped with a variety of standard features that enhance the driving experience and provide added convenience.
Mazda CX-50 Standard Features:
- Automatic Emergency Braking
- Blind Spot System
- Adaptive Cruise Control
- Remote Engine Start
- Parking Sensors
- Lane Keep Assist
- Forward Collision Warning
- Backup Camera
Toyota RAV4 Standard Features:
- Automatic Emergency Braking
- Blind Spot System
- Adaptive Cruise Control
- Remote Engine Start
- Parking Sensors
- Lane Keep Assist
- Forward Collision Warning
- Backup Camera
Optional Features
To differentiate and customize their vehicles further, both automakers offer a range of optional features that can be added based on personal preferences and needs.
Mazda CX-50 Optional Features:
- Surround View Camera
- Rear Cross-Traffic Alert
- Pedestrian Detection
- Heated and Ventilated Seats
- Premium Audio System
- Wireless Charging
Toyota RAV4 Optional Features:
- Surround View Camera
- Rear Cross-Traffic Alert
- Pedestrian Detection
- Heated and Ventilated Seats
- Premium Audio System
- Wireless Charging
| Feature | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Emergency Braking | Standard | Standard |
| Blind Spot System | Standard | Standard |
| Adaptive Cruise Control | Standard | Standard |
| Remote Engine Start | Standard | Standard |
| Parking Sensors | Standard | Standard |
| Lane Keep Assist | Standard | Standard |
| Forward Collision Warning | Standard | Standard |
| Backup Camera | Standard | Standard |
| Surround View Camera | Optional | Optional |
| Rear Cross-Traffic Alert | Optional | Optional |
| Pedestrian Detection | Optional | Optional |
| Heated and Ventilated Seats | Optional | Optional |
| Premium Audio System | Optional | Optional |
| Wireless Charging | Optional | Optional |
It’s clear that both the Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4 Prime offer a wide array of technology and features, making them both competitive options in the compact SUV market. Buyers can further refine their choice by considering other factors such as price, performance, and interior space. For more detailed comparisons, consider reading about the Corolla Cross vs RAV4 or the RAV4 vs Chevy Traverse.
Hybrid and Fuel Efficiency
Hybrid technology plays a crucial role when comparing the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4, particularly for those prioritizing fuel efficiency and eco-friendly driving options. In this section, we delve into the hybrid model specifications and fuel efficiency ratings of both vehicles.
Hybrid Model Specifications
The hybrid models of Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4 feature advanced technology designed to enhance power and fuel efficiency.
-
Mazda CX-50 Hybrid:
-
The 2025 Mazda CX-50 hybrid offers a total of 219 horsepower with a new on-demand e-AWD system.
-
It comes with three different trim levels.
-
Ground clearance ranges from 8.3 to 8.6 inches.
-
The vehicle supports four drive modes: Normal, Sport, Off-Road, and Towing mode (Mazda USA).
-
Toyota RAV4 Hybrid:
-
The Toyota RAV4 Hybrid boasts a total output of 219 horsepower.
-
It features an electronic on-demand all-wheel-drive system.
-
The vehicle operates seamlessly between its electric and gasoline power sources.
Fuel Efficiency Comparison
Fuel efficiency is a key consideration for hybrid vehicles, offering cost savings and environmental benefits. Below is a comparison of the EPA-estimated combined city/highway miles per gallon (mpg) for the two models.
| Vehicle | Total Horsepower | EPA-Estimated Combined MPG |
|---|---|---|
| Mazda CX-50 Hybrid | 219 hp | 38 mpg |
| Toyota RAV4 Hybrid | 219 hp | 40 mpg |
Both vehicles demonstrate impressive fuel efficiency, with the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid edging slightly ahead in terms of EPA-estimated combined mpg.
For a comprehensive comparison of other car models, check out related articles such as crv hybrid vs rav4 hybrid and rav4 prime vs hybrid.
Understanding the hybrid specifications and fuel efficiency of the Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4 aids in making an informed decision aligned with your driving needs and environmental considerations. Explore our additional comparisons like rav4 vs forester and toyota rav4 vs vw tiguan for further insights.
Driving Experience
Ride Quality and Handling
When comparing the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4 in terms of ride quality and handling, both vehicles offer unique features that cater to different driving preferences. The Mazda CX-50 is designed to provide a refined yet rugged driving experience. It boasts a solid powertrain and a plush, high-quality interior, making it desirable for both driving and daily living (Mazda USA). The 2024 CX-50 offers responsive steering and excellent road feedback, ensuring a smooth and confident ride on various terrain.
On the other hand, the Toyota RAV4 is well-regarded for its comfortable and composed ride. The RAV4’s suspension system effectively absorbs road imperfections, providing a smooth journey on both city streets and highways. The RAV4 also features a precise steering system that enhances its handling capabilities, making it easy to maneuver in tight spaces and on winding roads. For additional information about the RAV4’s ride quality, visit our comparison on Corolla Cross vs RAV4.
| Feature | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Ride Quality | Refined and Rugged | Comfortable and Composed |
| Handling | Responsive and Confident | Precise and Maneuverable |
Off-Road Capability
Both the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4 offer impressive off-road capabilities, but they cater to different levels of adventure. The Mazda CX-50 is equipped with i-Activ AWD® technology, which adjusts torque distribution to enhance traction and stability in various driving conditions (Mazda USA). With a ground clearance of 8.3-8.6 inches and four drive modes—Normal, Sport, Off-Road, and Towing—the CX-50 is prepared to tackle diverse terrains and weather conditions (Mazda USA).
The Toyota RAV4 also features an all-wheel-drive system that enhances its off-road performance. The RAV4’s Multi-Terrain Select system allows drivers to choose between modes like Mud & Sand, Rock & Dirt, and Snow, optimizing traction and control based on the environment. With its 8.4-inch ground clearance and well-tuned suspension, the RAV4 is suitable for light to moderate off-road adventures. For a deeper dive into the RAV4’s off-road capabilities, check out our article on RAV4 vs 4Runner.
| Off-Road Feature | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Ground Clearance | 8.3-8.6 inches | 8.4 inches |
| AWD Technology | i-Activ AWD® | Available AWD with Multi-Terrain Select |
| Drive Modes | Normal, Sport, Off-Road, Towing | Mud & Sand, Rock & Dirt, Snow |
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4 depends on the specific needs and preferences of the driver. Both vehicles offer compelling driving experiences that cater to a variety of on-road and off-road scenarios. For more comprehensive comparisons, explore our articles on Venza vs RAV4 and Hyundai Tucson vs RAV4.
Overall Value
When comparing the Mazda CX-50 and the Toyota RAV4, it’s essential to evaluate their overall value. Understanding the value proposition and pricing considerations will help potential buyers make an informed decision.
Value Proposition
The 2023 Mazda CX-50 and the 2023 Toyota RAV4 both offer unique benefits, making them attractive choices for those seeking a versatile and reliable SUV. The Mazda CX-50 boasts more interior space, providing extra legroom and cargo capacity compared to the Toyota RAV4 (Torque News). This can be a significant factor for families or individuals needing ample space for their adventures.
In terms of interior quality, the Mazda CX-50 stands out with its upscale materials and refined design. This level of luxury may appeal to buyers looking for a more premium feel in their vehicle. Additionally, the Mazda CX-50 is praised for its engaging driving experience, making it a compelling option for those who prioritize performance.
On the other hand, the Toyota RAV4 has its own set of advantages. Known for its reliability and durability, the RAV4 has a strong reputation for longevity and low maintenance costs. Toyota’s extensive dealer network and excellent resale value are also key factors that contribute to the RAV4’s overall value proposition.
Pricing Considerations
When looking at the starting prices, the 2023 Mazda CX-50 starts at $28,925, while the 2023 Toyota RAV4 starts at $29,610. The slightly lower starting price of the Mazda CX-50 may be a deciding factor for budget-conscious buyers (Torque News). However, it’s important to consider how the overall cost of ownership compares between the two vehicles.
| Feature | Mazda CX-50 | Toyota RAV4 |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $28,925 | $29,610 |
| Interior Space | More spacious | Adequate space |
| Interior Quality | Upscale materials | Functional design |
| Resale Value | Good | Excellent |
For a deeper dive into specific trim comparisons, our articles on RAV4 LE vs XLE and RAV4 XLE Premium vs Limited may provide more insights. Additionally, exploring alternatives within the Toyota lineup, such as the Hyundai Santa Fe vs Toyota RAV4, could also be beneficial.
In conclusion, while both the Mazda CX-50 and Toyota RAV4 offer distinct advantages, the choice ultimately depends on individual preferences and priorities. The Mazda CX-50 provides more space and a luxurious interior at a slightly lower starting price, whereas the Toyota RAV4 excels in reliability and resale value, which may appeal more to a certain segment of buyers.